Christopher Mitchell, director of group broadband networks for the Institute for local Self-Reliance, advised Vice that these votes are instructive. “I suppose the margin in Chicago and Denver is impressive,” Mitchell said. “after we work with communities where half the residents have a cable monopoly and the other half would not have any broadband, the demand for whatever thing enhanced is strong among both populations.” Mitchell’s group says that 83 million americans reside in a local area to a broadband monopoly, with Comcast being the typical offender. that’s on precise of the estimated forty two million who haven’t any broadband access at all and the tens of thousands and thousands who handiest have two choices, where once again Comcast dominates. “For years, we have referred to here is an immense issue for voters but local leaders stay too intimidated by the big monopoly cable and cellphone companies to act on it,” Mitchell said. “maybe now we can see it taken extra seriously.”
This could be the tipping point, even though in 22 states it is going to require repealing these ALEC-impressed municipal broadband bans. it could possibly take place—two years in the past 25 states had the bans. in keeping with a Broadband Now analyze, buyers in states without these bans “against municipal broadband have, on commonplace, 10% improved access to low-price broadband (which we classify as any standalone cyber web plan $60 per month or less).”
Arkansas and Connecticut have lifted restrictions on municipal broadband, and Idaho, Louisiana, Minnesota, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington State have taken contemporary legislative motion it’s municipal broadband-pleasant. Breaking big telecom’s very high priced stranglehold on the nation is possible, and a sensible factor to start getting on native ballots.